The AI system that detects and resolves inconsistencies across governance levels, turning policy documents into interoperable intelligence.
Cities, regions, and ministries produce hundreds of plans—each valid on its own but rarely aligned with others.
The result is overlapping objectives, contradictory timelines, and inefficient investments.
Policy coherence has long been recognised as a cornerstone of sustainable development, yet no digital system could measure or manage it at scale.
CohAI was created to change that.
By applying artificial intelligence to read across policies, regulations, and strategies, it exposes hidden contradictions and missed synergies.
It helps governments and territories move from reactive compliance to proactive coordination—restoring logic, efficiency, and trust in public action.
CohAI (Coherence through AI) is a semantic intelligence system that transforms policy text into actionable insight.
It analyses the content of laws, strategies, and planning documents across sectors and governance levels to detect inconsistencies and overlaps.
Using natural language processing and ontology mapping, it quantifies alignment with sustainability frameworks such as the SDGs, ESG indicators, and EU directives.
The platform delivers dashboards, coherence scores, and contradiction maps that allow institutions to understand how their decisions interact.
More than a monitoring tool, CohAI functions as a coherence engine—an AI-powered layer that brings clarity to complex policy ecosystems and supports transparent, evidence-based governance.
CohAI transforms thousands of policy documents into measurable coherence insights through six analytical layers.
Each one captures a distinct dimension of how governance works — from vertical consistency to ethical framing.
Together they make coherence auditable, explainable, and actionable.
The system was first tested in a controlled laboratory environment, using a representative set of publicly available planning and strategy documents from the AuvergneèRhone-Alpes (AuRA) region, Frabce
This pilot phase validated CohAI’s ability to identify contradictions between local zoning rules and regional sustainability objectives, confirming the soundness of its analytical logic.
The next milestone is to train a dedicated AI model on thousands of European, national, regional, and local documents to capture the full diversity of governance language and regulatory structures.
Once trained, CohAI will operate as the intelligence layer within the Territorial Sustainability Operating System (T-SOS), delivering real-time coherence diagnostics and alerts.
CohAI is currently in the transition from laboratory simulation to model training.
The first prototypes were tested in 2025 on public governance documents to validate coherence logic and interface usability.
During 2026, a full-scale semantic training phase will be launched using thousands of policy and planning documents from European, national, and regional sources.
Integration with the Territorial Sustainability Operating System (T-SOS) will follow, enabling live coherence monitoring.
The goal is to reach Technology Readiness Level 7 by late 2026 — with pilot deployments planned in France
CohAI is a living research and innovation ecosystem — open to collaboration with public institutions, research centers, and technology partners committed to building trustworthy AI for governance.
We welcome:
Its layered architecture links the Ethigrality Core (values), the Semantic Intelligence Engine (understanding), and the Operational Layer (decision support).
Together, they turn fragmented governance into coherent, explainable systems.
Each feature translates a key governance challenge into an actionable, explainable AI capability.
Transforms legal and policy text into structured knowledge.
CohAI reads across thousands of pages—laws, strategies, and plans—to detect overlaps, contradictions, and gaps using advanced natural language processing and ontology mapping.
🔍 Output: Structured policy datasets ready for cross-framework comparison.
Quantifies alignment across six governance dimensions.
Delivers real-time coherence scores, visual contradiction maps, and historical trend tracking, allowing decision-makers to see where strategies diverge or reinforce each other.
📊 Output: Interactive dashboards with coherence index, ethical alignment, and interoperability metrics.
Exposes policy contradictions invisible to manual review.
Automatically highlights conflicting goals, misaligned targets, or overlapping timelines between documents or governance levels.
⚖️ Output: AI-generated contradiction reports with severity and location tags.
Anchors coherence in ethical and sustainability principles.
Based on the Ethigrality framework, this layer ensures that coherence goes beyond logic — assessing moral, environmental, and intergenerational consistency.
🕊️ Output: Ethigrality Alignment Score and qualitative coherence summaries.
Integrates seamlessly with digital public infrastructures.
Built for interoperability with the Territorial Sustainability Operating System (T-SOS) and standards like EU AI Act, CSRD, and SDG frameworks.
🔗 Output: Machine-readable policy data and exportable compliance packages.
Predicts coherence under alternative strategies.
Governments can simulate the effect of policy changes — e.g., modifying zoning ratios or budget priorities — and instantly visualize the resulting coherence shifts.
🧮 Output: Scenario-based coherence differentials and decision support recommendations.
From overlapping plans to measurable alignment — how CohAI quantifies coherence across six governance dimensions.
We will contact you soon
Our excellent customer support team is ready to help.
Before a policy, investment, or corporate initiative advances to budget committees, boards, or parliaments, it must answer five core questions and one transversal test:
Core Principles:
Transversal Test:
If a proposal fails any core principle test, it is deemed incoherent and cannot proceed. If a proposal passes all five principles individually but violates Balance (e.g., "we're improving worker Wealth but destroying ecological Balance"), it is also rejected as incoherent. This is not a veto; it is a filter. Proposals that pass MAP—satisfying all five principles in balance—advance to the normal governance cycle with ethics already embedded, reducing downstream contradictions.
Where MAP is Used:
AIG recognizes that the Higher Objectives cannot be achieved by any one actor alone, and that Balance—the principle ensuring no one objective dominates—requires all stakeholders to be present in decision-making:
Without all five voices at the table, Balance is impossible. One principle will inevitably dominate.
AIG embeds this interdependence into governance structures:
Where AIG is Used:
CIF uses data integration and algorithmic analysis to detect these Balance violations early, before they accumulate into systemic failures.
Three Layers of Monitoring:
1. Principle-Specific Signals
2. Balance-Violation Detection
3. Early Warning System
Data Sources:
Human Oversight: CIF is not autonomous. Algorithms detect divergences and principle conflicts; humans interpret context and decide action. This preserves accountability while enabling scale and speed.
Where CIF is Used:
Four Components:
1. Scenario Testing for Balance
2. Citizen Review Panels for Balance
3. Balance Tipping Point Monitoring
Certain breaches of Balance trigger automatic policy review:
When crossed, governance pauses and reassesses, rather than continuing on autopilot
2. Iterative Refinement for Balance
Rather than 5-year policy cycles, AES embeds 6-month reflection cycles where evidence is reviewed:
Where AES is Used:
Life is the most fundamental principle. It encompasses:
Without life, all other goods are impossible. Future generations cannot be secured if people are starving today. Resources cannot be justly distributed if communities are dying of preventable disease. Knowledge cannot flourish if people are consumed by survival anxiety. Moral freedom cannot exist if people live in fear.
This principle appears across human civilizations. Indigenous traditions prioritize "seven generations" of human and ecological survival. Christian theology affirms the sanctity of life. Jewish law protects the vulnerable. Secular human rights frameworks place life and health at the foundation of dignity. Islamic jurisprudence recognizes that in cases of existential threat, survival takes priority—but this principle has a universal lesson: life is so fundamental that ordinary governance must never make survival exceptional. It is the baseline condition for everything else.
Life without Balance collapses into ecological crisis. A policy that improves public health while destroying ecosystems violates Balance because it undermines the future Life of coming generations. A corporation that increases worker safety (Life) while poisoning the local water supply (Balance violation) has failed the test.
Progeny extends beyond children to future generations and the conditions that make flourishing possible. It encompasses:
Progeny is the principle of time itself. It asks: What are we building that will last? What are we leaving behind? A society that maximizes present consumption at the cost of future instability has chosen convenience over justice. Progeny rejects this bargain.
This is why every enduring civilization has emphasized intergenerational responsibility. Indigenous cultures institutionalize the "seventh generation principle"—decisions must be evaluated by their impact on descendants seven generations forward. Religious traditions across the world teach stewardship and custodianship of resources for those to come. Modern climate science quantifies exactly what this principle demands: we must live within planetary boundaries so future humans have a habitable world.
Progeny without Balance leads to unsustainable extraction. A policy that educates children while poisoning their future environment violates Balance. A corporation that invests in worker development while depleting the ecological commons has failed the test. Progeny demands that we secure future generations without sacrificing their Life or Balance.
Intellect is the capacity for reason, understanding, and the pursuit of truth. It encompasses:
Intellect is what enables humans to understand reality and make free, informed choices. Without it, people cannot consent to governance; they can only be controlled. Without it, communities cannot solve problems or adapt to change. Without it, societies stagnate.
Every human civilization has recognized that the capacity to think, question, and learn is indispensable. Plato placed reason at the center of justice. Confucian philosophy makes education foundational to social order. Indigenous traditions pass knowledge across generations through teaching and dialogue. Modern democracies depend on educated citizens who can evaluate evidence and hold power accountable.
Intellect without Balance becomes destructive. A technology that advances knowledge while enabling surveillance and manipulation violates Balance. A corporation that invests in R&D while suppressing worker voice or manipulating consumer information has failed the test. Intellect must serve all five principles, not dominate them.
Conscience is the capacity to hold and act on moral convictions, including but not limited to religious belief. It encompasses:
Conscience is the seat of human dignity. It is what allows people to say "no" to unjust commands, to stand with the oppressed even when alone, to maintain moral integrity under pressure. Without Conscience, people are mere instruments of authority. Without Conscience, communities cannot have genuine moral conversation—they can only enforce conformity.
This principle appears in every enduring civilization and ethical tradition. Freedom of belief is a universal human right recognized across cultures. The capacity to witness injustice and speak truth is protected in legal traditions worldwide. Philosophers from different eras and places recognize that moral autonomy—the right to follow one's conscience—is foundational to human dignity.
Conscience without Balance becomes coercive. A society that honors religious conscience while suppressing critical dissent violates Balance. A corporation that respects worker beliefs while ignoring their economic needs has failed the test. Conscience must be universal—extended equally to those we agree with and those we don't. And critically, Conscience must protect the right to question and challenge, not just to believe privately.
Wealth is not mere accumulation but stewardship—resources held in trust and circulated justly. It encompasses:
Wealth is the material condition for human flourishing. Without resources, people cannot survive, educate children, pursue knowledge, or maintain dignity. But wealth pursued without justice corrodes everything else. Inequality breeds resentment and instability. Exploitation generates poverty and desperation. Resource extraction without regeneration destroys the future.
Every human society has recognized that resources must be circulated justly for communities to endure. Indigenous cultures developed sophisticated commons management systems that sustained communities across centuries. Religious traditions teach that wealth is not personal possession but stewardship. Modern economics recognizes that fair distribution, rule of law, and worker protection are essential to stable markets. Environmental science shows that resources are finite and must be regenerated.
Wealth without Balance becomes exploitation. A corporation that accumulates profit while destroying ecosystems (Balance violation) or underpaying workers (Wealth unjustly distributed) has failed the test. Wealth must be circulated fairly, used sustainably, and never at the cost of Life, Progeny, Conscience, or Intellect.
Balance is not a sixth principle to be "protected" like the others. Rather, it is a cross-cutting, transversal principle that orchestrates the five core principles, ensuring they remain in harmony and never contradict each other. (The term al-mīzān from Islamic jurisprudence names this principle, reflecting its deep grounding in Islamic legal thought, but the principle itself is recognized across philosophical and natural systems worldwide.)
Where the five core principles define what must be protected, Balance defines how they must be held together.
Across Life and Progeny: Balance ensures that securing immediate survival doesn't undermine future generations' capacity to survive. A famine relief program that protects Life now must not deplete resources that Progeny requires.
Across Life and Wealth: Balance ensures that creating prosperity doesn't exploit vulnerable people and strip them of the conditions for survival. Growth that improves Wealth while destroying workers' Life violates Balance.
Across Intellect and Conscience: Balance ensures that advancing knowledge doesn't suppress freedom of belief, and that protecting belief doesn't suppress critical inquiry. Scientific freedom and religious freedom must coexist, not dominate each other.
Across Wealth and Progeny: Balance ensures that accumulating resources now doesn't load unsustainable debt onto future generations, and that investment in the future doesn't create poverty today.
Across all five simultaneously: Balance asks the fundamental question: Are we advancing all five principles together, or is one being sacrificed for others?
Balance reveals itself most clearly in complexity—when multiple goods are in tension:
In each case, Balance is not compromise—splitting the difference between justice and injustice. Rather, Balance is coherence: designing governance so all five principles advance together.
Balance is not a human invention—it is a pattern woven into creation itself. Physics, ecology, chemistry, social systems—all operate according to equilibrium principles. Gravity balances objects. Ecosystems balance predator and prey. Water cycles move through atmosphere and ocean in proportion. Social systems that ignore balance collapse into conflict or dysfunction.
This pattern is recognized across civilizations: Chinese philosophy centers on yin-yang balance; Indigenous wisdom teaches harmony with natural cycles; Stoic philosophy emphasizes living in accordance with natural order; modern systems theory studies how balance maintains resilience. The principle is universal: transgress the balance and systems break.
Balance operates at every level:
Current Prototypes:
🔹 GLOBALIGN - Trade Readiness & Sustainable Export Intelligence
Status: Demonstrated
In Active Testing
Focus: 4R Framework™ for ESG-compliant export strategy Ready for: SME pilots, national trade promotion agencies
🔹 GREEN DELIGENCE - Sustainable Finance & Portfolio ESG Integration
Status: Demonstrated
In Active Testing
Focus: ESG automation across investment cycle (pre-investment → reporting)
Ready for: Impact funds, DFIs, institutional investors ---
HOW THEY WORK TOGETHER
Research Integration: Exporters use Globalign (4R Framework™) → Achieve PERI™ readiness certification → Access Green Deligence-integrated financing → Sustainable value chain enabled
Measures alignment across governance levels — national, regional, and local.
Detects when local plans contradict higher-level strategies (e.g., zoning vs. climate targets).
Helps ensure top-down policies cascade coherently into territorial implementation.
Goes beyond compliance to evaluate cross-scale reinforcement.
Identifies where different levels of government pursue mutually supportive objectives — creating synergies instead of duplication.
Quantifies how strategies converge toward shared sustainability outcomes.
Examines intersectoral consistency across themes such as housing, mobility, health, and environment.
Highlights conflicts between departmental or policy silos that share territory but not vocabulary.
Enables integrated planning and avoids contradictory investments.
Assesses the semantic and ethical quality of policy language.
Checks whether commitments are explicit, measurable, and aligned with SDG/ESG principles.
Bridges the gap between policy intention and implementation clarity.
Aligns short-, medium-, and long-term planning horizons.
Detects time gaps where a long-term climate goal conflicts with short-term infrastructure choices.
Ensures continuity across electoral and strategic cycles.
Evaluates how policy functions — not just what it says.
Measures operational interdependence among programmes, budgets, and delivery mechanisms.
Provides a systems view linking resources, responsibilities, and results.
Your payment was processed successfully. Congratulations!
You have cancelled the payment process.
This popup does not exist. I'm sorry.